JAMA’s editor sacked
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Editor—The sacking of Lundberg as JAMA’s editor is a very sad event for editorial freedom in general and for medical journals world wide in particular. This disgraceful incident has shown that neither size nor success gives any guarantee for editorial freedom— not even the two combined. The fight for integrity must go on continuously in every editorial office every day. Lundberg has been an example for other editors through his editorial integrity, scientific judgment, and his personal strength and warmth. I suggest that the global community of medical journal editors, through its organisations, establish an award for editorial integrity and name it the George D Lundberg Award.
منابع مشابه
Editorial governance of the Journal of the American Medical Association: a report.
THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION has enjoyed an illustrious 116-year history as a peerreviewed medical journal dedicated to the science and art of medicine and the betterment of the public health. When George D. Lundberg, MD, editor of JAMA, was removed from his position on January 15, 1999, there was concern within the medical and scientific publishing communities that his dismi...
متن کاملEditorial independence is built on trust and communication.
In January of that year George D Lundberg, Editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], was sacked by the American Medical Association (Anderson 1999). Some five months later, Jerome P Kassirer, Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, left the Journal when his contract with the Massachusetts Medical Society, the journal’s owners, was not renewed (Smith 1999). At the ...
متن کاملSusan Mango
Technological Research Council (Tubitak). The magazine’s editor, Cigdem Atakuman, was also sacked for ‘exceeding her authority’ by commissioning the article, which the council said was “not planned or scientifically evaluated beforehand”. The government has denied playing any role in the article’s withdrawal and has joined in the condemnation, despite its wellknown opposition to evolutionary th...
متن کاملNew house-officers' views on unprofessional behaviour.
AIM To determine the views of new house officers (HO) on professionalism and unprofessional behaviour following dismissal in January 2007 of a HO who was caught video-taping nurses in the shower. METHODS An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was administered during new house officers' orientation. Using a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), HO were asked to rank...
متن کاملSACkED: Sentiment Analysis of Corporate Earnings Documents
In this paper, we present SACkED, Sentiment Analysis of Corporate Earnings Documents, with the goal of finding mispriced stocks by extracting sentiments (or opinions) about a company in the public statements that it issues. In particular, we will focus our attention on the publicly-available transcripts of earnings calls, where companies discuss financial performance after a reporting period. I...
متن کامل